- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 周来祥和谐美思想及其实践价值研究    

姓名:

 陈颖嘉    

学号:

 20081212639    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 010106    

学科名称:

 哲学 - 哲学 - 美学    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 哲学硕士    

学校:

 西安电子科技大学    

院系:

 人文学院    

专业:

 哲学    

研究方向:

 美学    

第一导师姓名:

 李蕊芹    

第一导师单位:

 人文学院    

完成日期:

 2023-05-23    

答辩日期:

 2023-05-24    

外文题名:

 Research on Zhou Laixiang's thought of harmonious aesthetics and its practical value    

中文关键词:

 周来祥 ; 和谐美思想 ; 崇高美 ; 辩证和谐美 ; 实践价值    

外文关键词:

 Zhou Laixiang ; The idea of harmonious aesthetics ; Sublime aesthetics ; Dialectical harmony aesthetics ; Practical value    

中文摘要:

周来祥一生从事美学研究近60年,留下了宝贵的美学遗产。在《论美是和谐》一文中,首次提出“美是和谐”的完整论断:“我认为美是和谐,是人和自然、主体和客体、理性和感性、自由和必然、实践活动的合目的性和客观世界的规律性的和谐统一。”[]周来祥自上世纪五十年代开始,投身美学研究。五十年代末六十年代初,在参加高教部组织的大学生《美学原理》教材编写的一次讨论会上,首次提出了“美是和谐”的观点,从此开启了“和谐美学”思想的构建。六十到七十年代,依托在实际教学和科研中的不断尝试和探索,周来祥“和谐美学”体系理论逐渐完善并发展成为一套理论体系。八十年代,随着相关的学术专著和论文的出版发表,其和谐美学体系逐步完成,该学术成果受到学界重视,“和谐美学”成为学术界公认的一个学术流派。九十年代,西方当代美学理论和现代艺术思潮大量进入中国,周来祥以积极的态度吸取了其中有益的思想成分,并引入到自己的思想体系中,使“和谐美学”内容更为完善。到了新世纪,“和谐美学”紧跟社会时代发展,从诸多现实问题入手,获得了新的发展。

本文主要从四个方面来阐述周来祥的和谐美学思想。

第一方面主要从选题缘由、研究现状综述以及研究价值展开。就其研究现状而言,学术界针对周来祥美学体系主要分为方法研究、理论内容研究和思想影响研究三大类别。就研究广度来说,目前学术界对周来祥美学思想本体研究、形成方法论研究、思想影响及价值等研究方面都有涉及,但就研究深度来说,尚有可探讨之处。尤其是在其思想的实践价值方面,立足当今实践,研究尚有余地可把握。一是把握其动态开放的和谐美理论体系和研究方法,了解其和谐美思想内涵。二是兼顾理论和实际,在其影响研究领域以期有所突破,在美育方向寻找契合点,强调其思想的实践价值,尤其是梳理出“和谐美”与“和谐”这一社会时代主题的内在关联。

第二方面是分析周来祥和谐美思想理论的形成基础。周来祥的美学体系横贯古今,中西并包,融汇吸收了各家有益的成果,是一个动态开放的理论体系。其次是对周来祥和谐美理论独特的研究方法进行分析和梳理,包括理论和实践相统一、逻辑和历史相统一以及借鉴现代自然科学的研究方法。基于思想内容上的推陈出新以及研究方法上的大胆革新等优势,周来祥的美学思想才能立足辩证思维,提出辩证和谐美的观点,形成完整的理论体系。

第三方面把握周来祥和谐美的思想内容。周来祥基于和谐美构成的不同质的形态与各异的量的组合和重叠,对和谐美的不同历史形态进行了详尽的分析和论述,提出了著名的美的三大形态理论:古典和谐美、近代崇高美和现代辩证和谐美。

第四方面对周来祥和谐美思想的实践价值进行思考。周来祥不断坚持发展和完善自己的美学体系,其和谐美学思想随着社会时代的变化而进一步发展。在此基础上,笔者以客观辩证的研究视角对其美学思想作出实践层面的关照和思考。主要涉及对其思想中“和谐人格”与审美教育的实践功能分析,另外是把握其与“和谐文化”“和谐社会”的同构关系,通过这些研究来进一步引起人们对其思想体系实践价值的重视和思考。

本文力图通过对周来祥和谐美思想体系进行梳理和阐释,了解和把握周来祥和谐美思想的独特研究方法、丰富思想内涵和伟大实践价值,从而进一步认识和发展其和谐美学思想。

外文摘要:

Zhou Laixiang has been engaged in aesthetic research for nearly 60 years throughout his life, leaving behind a valuable aesthetic heritage. In the article "On aesthetics is harmony", a complete conclusion of "aesthetics is harmony" was put forward for the first time: "I think aesthetics is harmony, which is the harmonious unity of man and nature, subject and object, reason and sensibility, freedom and necessity, the purposiveness of practical activities and the regularity of the objective world." Zhou Laixiang has devoted himself to aesthetic research since the 1950s. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, at a seminar organized by the Ministry of Higher Education on the compilation of the textbook "Principles of Aesthetics" for college students, the viewpoint of "aesthetics is harmony" was first proposed, and from then on, the construction of the concept of "harmonious aesthetics" began. In the 1960s and 1970s, relying on continuous attempts and explorations in practical teaching and research, Zhou Laixiang's theory of "harmonious aesthetics" gradually improved and developed into a theoretical system. In the 1980s, with the publication of relevant academic monographs and papers, its harmonious aesthetic system gradually completed, and this academic achievement received attention from the academic community. "Harmonious aesthetics" became a recognized aesthetic academic school in the aesthetic academic community. In the 1990s, a large number of contemporary Western aesthetic theories and modern art trends were introduced to China. Zhou Laixiang absorbed beneficial ideological elements with a positive attitude and introduced them into his own ideological system, making the content of "harmonious aesthetics" more perfect. In the new century, "harmonious aesthetics" has closely followed the development of the social era, starting from many practical problems and achieving new development.

 

This article mainly elaborates on Zhou Laixiang's harmonious aesthetic ideas from four aspects.

 

The first aspect mainly focuses on the reasons for the topic selection, a review of the current research status, and the research value. In terms of its research status, the academic community mainly divides Zhou Laixiang's aesthetic ideas into three categories: methodological research, theoretical content research, and ideological influence research. In terms of research breadth, there are currently studies in the academic community on the ontology of Zhou Laixiang's aesthetic thought, the formation methodology, the influence and value of ideas, etc. However, in terms of research depth, there is still room for exploration. Especially in terms of the practical value of his ideas, based on current practice, there is still room for research to be grasped. In the research value section, one is to grasp its dynamic and open theoretical system and research methods of harmonious aesthetics to understand its ideological connotation of harmonious aesthetics. The second is to balance theory and practice, in order to make breakthroughs in the field of its impact research, find a suitable point in the direction of aesthetic education, emphasize the practical value of its ideas, and especially sort out the relationship between "harmonious aesthetics" and the theme of the social era of "harmony".

 

The second aspect is the elaboration of the theoretical foundation of Zhou Laixiang's harmonious aesthetics thought. Firstly, it is the grasp and inheritance of relevant ideological theories from ancient and modern times, both at home and abroad. Zhou Laixiang's aesthetic system spans across ancient and modern times, encompassing both China and the West, and integrating and absorbing the beneficial achievements of various schools. It is a dynamic and open theoretical system. Secondly, it analyzes and sorts out the unique research methods of Zhou Laixiang's theory of harmonious aesthetics, including the unity of theory and practice, the unity of logic and history, and the research methods influenced by modern natural sciences. Based on the advantages of promoting innovation in ideological content and bold innovation in research methods, Zhou Laixiang's aesthetic thought can be based on dialectical thinking and propose the viewpoint of dialectical harmony aesthetics, which has a profound impact.

 

The third aspect is to grasp the ideological content of Zhou Laixiang's harmonious aesthetics. Zhou Laixiang conducted a detailed analysis and discussion on the different historical forms of harmonious aesthetics based on the combination and overlap of different forms and quantities of harmonious aesthetics. He proposed three famous forms of aesthetics: classical harmonious aesthetics, modern noble aesthetics, and modern dialectical harmonious aesthetics.

 

The fourth party ponders on the practical value of Zhou Laixiang's idea of harmonious aesthetics. Zhou Laixiang constantly adheres to the development and improvement of his aesthetic system, and his harmonious aesthetic ideas have further developed with the changes of social times. On this basis, the author takes an objective and dialectical research perspective to provide practical consideration and reflection on his aesthetic ideas. It mainly involves the practical functional analysis of "harmonious personality" and aesthetic education in his thought, and also grasp the isomorphism and correlation with "harmonious culture" and "harmonious society", so as to further arouse people's attention and thinking on its practical value through these studies.

 

This article attempts to sort out and explain Zhou Laixiang's harmonious aesthetics thought, understand and grasp the unique research method, enrich the ideological connotation and great practical value of Zhou Laixiang's harmonious aesthetics thought, and further understand and develop his harmonious aesthetic thought.

参考文献:
专著方面:
[1] [英]鲍桑葵.美学史[M].张今译,北京:商务印书馆,1985.
[2]丁度等.集韵[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2017.
[3]房玄龄.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[4][德]黑格尔.美学(第一卷)[M].朱光潜译.北京:商务印书馆,2006.
[5][德]黑格尔.美学(第三卷上册)[M].寇鹏程译,重庆:重庆出版社,2016.
[6]康殷.文学源流浅说[M].北京:荣宝斋,1979.
[7]刘继平.和谐自由论美学思想研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2010.
[8]列宁.列宁选集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[9]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[10]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社1995.
[11]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集(第42卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[12]阮元校刻.十三经注疏.礼记正义[M].北京:中华书局影印本,1980.
[13]阮元校刻.十三经注疏.尚书正义[M].北京:中华书局,1980.
[14]魏收.魏书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[15]许慎.说文解字[M].北京:中国书店出版社,2011.
[16]袁可嘉.现代主义文学研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1989.
[17][美]伊哈布·哈桑.后现代主义问题[M].袁可嘉等编译.现代主义文学研究(上)[C],北京:中国社会科学出版,1989.
[18]周来祥.论美是和谐[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1984.
[19]周来祥.再论美是和谐[M].广西:广西师范大学出版社,1996.
[20]周来祥.三论美是和谐[M].山东:山东大学出版社,2007.
[21]周来祥.文艺美学[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2003.
[22]周来祥.乘风集[M],上海:新文艺出版社,1958.
[23]周来祥.论中国古典美学[M],山东:齐鲁书社,1987.
[24]周来祥.美学问题论稿[M],山西:山西人民出版社,1984.
[25]周来祥.中国美学主潮[M],山东:山东大学出版社,1992.
[26]周来祥.古代的美·近代的美·现代的美[M],吉林:东北师范大学出版社,1996.
[27]周来祥.周来祥美学文选(上)[M].广西:广西师范大学出版社,1998.
[28]周来祥.周来祥美学文选(下)[M].广西:广西师范大学出版社,1998.
[29]周来祥.美是和谐——周来祥美学文选[M].山东:山东文艺出版社,2020.
[30]周来祥.马克思列宁主义的美学原则[M].湖北:湖北人民出版社,1957.
[31]周纪文.和谐论美学思想研究[M].济南:齐鲁书社,2007.
期刊论文:
[1]贝塔朗菲.普通系统论的历史和现状[J].载《国外社会科学》,1987.
[2]陈剑.论“和谐人格”——周来祥审美教育思想的核心概念分析[J].美育学刊,2013,4(01).
[3]韩德信.中国近现代美学发展勾勒与周来祥美学理论述评[J].社会科学家,1998(02).
[4]戴磊.周来祥:一个为美学事业燃烧了生命的人——悼来祥君[J].马克思主义美学研究,2012,15(01).
[5]傅谨.周来祥美学思想的自我超越——评《再论美是和谐》[J].浙江社会科学,2001(02).
[6]封孝伦.周来祥美学理论体系刍议[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),1995(02).
[7]巩庆海.也谈美是和谐[J].聊城师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),1987(03).
[8]黄理彪.从抽象走向具体──辩证思维方法与周来祥美学思想体系[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1996(03).
[9]金路杰.对周来祥传统和谐美学的重估与反思[D].浙江师范大学,2013.
[10]李华.周来祥和谐美学思想及其当代价值研究[D].安徽大学,2010.
[11]龙辛.一部富有特色的中国古典美学论著——评周来祥的《论中国古典美学》[J].山东社会科学,1987(03).
[12]刘继平.“辨证发展的和谐美学观”之内涵—以周来祥的和谐美学为例[J].知识经济,2008(03).
[13]刘继平.周来祥与和谐自由论美学的形成与发展[J].马克思主义美学研究,2012,15(01).
[14]刘继平.周来祥和谐自由论美学思想研究[D].华中师范大学,2009.
[15]李富华.比较美学研究方法略论——兼论周来祥的贡献[J].思想战线,2003(04).
[16]刘恒健.略论周来祥的和谐美学[J].广西社会科学,1997(01).
[17]马龙潜,高迎纲.论周来祥“和谐”的审美和社会理想—关于“和谐论美学”的对话[J].马克思主义美学研究,2007,10(00).
[18]马龙潜.缅怀恩师周来祥[J].马克思主义美学研究,2011,14(02).
[19]牛宏宝.周来祥教授谈当代中国美学研究[J].文史哲,1995(02).
[20]彭超宇.李伯川,从系统论看改革开放的合理性[J].云南社会科学,2008(S1).
[21]孙双.系统论关照下的中国水墨画变革[J].艺术百家,2006-03-30.
[22]宋民.贯通古今以求索融汇中西而开拓──《周来祥美学文选》讨论会综述[J].文史哲,1999(06).
[23]王一川.美学对象不是“审美关系”──与周来祥同志商榷[J].江汉论坛,1985(03).
[24]王中礼,周来祥美学思想的贡献与局限[D].山东师范大学,2016.
[25]王杰.美学的危机与理论的张力——访著名美学家周来祥先生[J].社会科学家,1989(03).
[26]薛富兴.美的三大历史形态——周来祥和谐美学略论[J].贵阳师范高等专科学校学报(社会科学版),2003(01).
[27]薛富兴.美是和谐——周来祥美学论略[J].民族艺术研究,2003(02).
[28]徐成凤.周来祥美学思想探析[D].山东:山东师范大学,2020.
[29]杨存昌.构筑人类审美王国的理性大厦──周来祥教授美学思想讨论会概述[J].山东社会科学,1996(01).
[30]周来祥.美和崇高纵横谈[J].载《中国社会科学》,1987,第4期.
[31]周来祥.辩证和谐美学与审丑教育[J].文艺研究,2003,(4).
[32]周来祥.现代和谐的哲学与美学思考[J].文史哲,2008,No.304(01).
[33]周来祥.和·中和·中——再论中国传统文化的和谐精神及其审美特征[J].文史哲,2006(02).
[34]周来祥.梦想、拼搏、感悟:我的大学[J].中国美学,2020(01).
[35]周来祥.荒诞和荒诞的后现代主义[J].文艺研究,1995(06).
[36]周来祥.论哲学、美学中主客二元对立思维模式的产生、发展及其辩证解决[J].文艺研究,2005(04).
[37]周来祥.辩证思维·矛盾思维·和谐思维[J].学术月刊,2007,No.463(12).
[38]周欣展.求索于文学与政治之间——“马克思主义美学与现代中国”国际学术研讨会综述[J].甘肃社会科学,2008,No.172(01).
[39]周纪文.构筑和谐美学的理论体系大厦——周来祥美学思想述评[J].阴山学刊,2003(02).
[40]周纪文.和谐论美学中的美育思想[J].汕头大学学报,2005(06).
[41]周纪文.对“美是和谐”的再思考——周来祥先生逝世十周年纪念[J].马克思主义美学研究,2021,24(02).
[42]曾繁仁.论百年中国美学的创新性发展历程[J].山东社会科学,2019,No.289(09).
[43]周文君.和谐美学对美学中国化的探索和贡献[J].贵州社会科学,2010,No.252(12).
[44]朱玉杰,赵圣之.周来祥与中国马克思主义美学[J].马克思主义美学研究,2021,24(02).
中图分类号:

 11    

开放日期:

 2023-12-26    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式