老子以水喻道，他借水指代形上之道。这就意味着，我们可以通过对老子思想中的水的考察，去了解老子关于道的思想。在老子思想中，水与道的关系分别从以下三方面展开。

首先是以水喻道。在老子思想中，水的形象很丰富，相应地，水喻指向的哲学思想也极其丰富。在自然界中水的存在样态多种多样，《老子》中的水亦如是，江河湖海、雨、谷等都是《老子》中水的存在样态，老子以“水”隐喻“道”，水对万物具有生养作用指向了道之生，即道是万物的本原思想；水具有柔弱的特征，又具有强大的力量，这指向了弱者道之用的思想；水具有不争之德指向了道之无为、不争的思想。同时，老子由道出发讨论了理想人格理念与社会政治理念，水喻在这里面也有所体现。

其次是观水悟道。从认识论角度而言，在老子的认识论中，以水喻道体现老子体道的认识思想，我们可以用观水悟道来概括这一点。老子以道为认识论的最终目的，老子对世界的认识，不单停留于对物的认识，更注重对道的认识。老子之所以能够观水悟道，是因为老子是通过对物的认识来把握道。这表明在认识论中，老子能够由物复归于道，在观水悟道中体现为老子由水复归于道。名论是老子的认识论思想背景，其以语言概念问题为主要内容。老子反思了“名学”理论，看到了语言概念的局限性，即语言概念无法把握道。在这一认识背景下，老子重新审视了认识对象，指出认识对象不仅有物，同时还有道，并且道是认识活动的最终目的。老子认为认识主体能够通过“损”、静观的认识方式认识道、把握道，或者说，损、静观的方式是由物进入到道的途径。这样一种认识方式具有直觉理性主义的特点，表明了直觉理性是把握道的方式，同时这种直觉理性的认识方式要求主体在进入道中达到虚静的心灵状态。

最后是水之美展现了道之美。通过在审美视域下对老子以水喻道的考察，我们能够知道老子不仅以经验世界为其审美对象，也以形上之道为其审美对象。在经验世界中，老子看到了阴柔之美，指出阴柔展现出了强大的生命力量。阴柔之美的背后，指向的是形而上学的道，这也就是说，老子对阴柔的推崇源于形上之道的道德内容，阴柔之美的存在论基础是形上世界之道。老子通过对物的审美，进入到对道的审美中，这意味着物与道之间有着紧密关联，即道物无际。道物无际是建立在老庄心性论基础上的结果，体现了老子的美学精神。我们将从对水象、水德的讨论出发，揭示出道物无际的美学意蕴，认识老子体道的审美精神。

这样，通过对老子思想中水的考察，我们能够看到老子思想中的道之面貌。

Lao Tzu used water as a metaphor for the Tao, and he used water to refer to the metaphysical Tao. This means that we can understand Lao Tzu's thoughts on Tao by examining the water in Lao Tzu's thought. In Lao Tzu's thought, the relationship between water and Dao unfolds from three aspects.

The first is the question of using water as a metaphor for Tao. In Laozi's thought, the image of water is rich, and correspondingly, the philosophical thoughts pointed to by the metaphor of water are also extremely rich. There are various forms of water in nature, and the same is true for water in Laozi. Rivers, lakes, seas, rain, and valleys are all forms of water in Laozi. Laozi uses "water" as a metaphor for "Tao". ", water has a nourishing effect on all things, which points to the birth of Tao, that is, Tao is the original thought of all things; water has soft and weak characteristics, but also has strong power, which points to the idea of Tao's use for the weak; water has the virtue of indisputable It points to the inaction and indisputable thought of the Tao. At the same time, Lao Tzu discussed the ideal personality concept and social and political concept from the Tao, and the metaphor of water is also reflected in this.

The second is the question of comprehending the water. From the perspective of epistemology, in Lao Tzu's epistemology, Lao Tzu's understanding of Tao is reflected in the metaphor of water, and we can summarize this by observing water and comprehending Tao. Lao Tzu takes Tao as the ultimate goal of his epistemology. Lao Tzu's understanding of the world does not only stop at the understanding of things, but also pays more attention to the understanding of Tao. The reason why Lao Tzu was able to observe the water and comprehend the Tao is because Lao Tzu grasped the Tao through the understanding of things. This shows that in epistemology, Lao Tzu can return to Dao from things, and in the observation of water and comprehension of Dao, it is reflected in Laozi's return to Dao from water. The theory of names is the background of Laozi's epistemological thought, and its main content is the problem of language concepts. Lao Tzu reflected on the theory of "name learning" and saw the limitations of language concepts, that is, language concepts could not grasp the Tao. Under this background of cognition, Lao Tzu re-examined the object of cognition and pointed out that the object of cognition not only has things, but also Tao, and Tao is the ultimate goal of cognition activities. Laozi believes that the subject of knowledge can recognize and grasp the Tao through the way of "damage" and contemplation. Such a way of knowing has the characteristics of intuitive rationalism, which shows that intuitive reason is the way to grasp the Tao, and at the same time, this way of knowing requires the subject to achieve a state of emptiness and tranquility when entering the Tao.

Finally, there is the issue of the beauty of water showing the beauty of Tao. From the perspective of aesthetics, we can know that Laozi not only takes the experience world as his aesthetic object, but also takes metaphysical Tao as his aesthetic object. In the world of experience, Lao Tzu saw the beauty of femininity and pointed out that femininity showed a powerful life force. Behind the beauty of femininity, it points to the Tao of metaphysics, which means that Lao Tzu's respect for femininity stems from the moral content of the Tao of metaphysics, and the ontological basis of the beauty of femininity is the Tao of the metaphysical world. Through the aesthetics of things, Laozi entered the aesthetics of Tao, which means that there is a close relationship between things and Tao, that is, Tao is boundless. Taoism is boundless is the result based on Laozi's theory of mind and nature, and reflects Laozi's aesthetic spirit. Starting from the discussion of water phenomenon and water virtue, we will reveal the boundless aesthetic connotation of Taoism and understand Laozi's aesthetic spirit of Taoism.

In this way, by examining the water in Lao Tzu's thought, we can see the face of Tao in Lao Tzu's thought.

[1]王卡点校.老子道德经河上公章句[M].北京:中华书局,1993.
[2]荆门市博物馆编.郭店楚墓竹简·太一生水、鲁穆公问子思[M].北京:文物出版社,2002.
[3]陈嘉映.语言哲学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[4]黎翔凰撰.新编诸子集成:管子校注[M].北京:中华书局,2004.
[5](魏)王弼注,楼宇烈校释.老子道德经注校释[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[6](清)郭庆藩撰,王孝鱼点校.新编诸子集成:庄子集释[M].北京:中华书局,2012.
[7](宋)朱熹撰.新编诸子集成:四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,2012.
[8](汉)许慎撰,(宋)宋鉉校定,愚若注音.注音版说文解字[M].北京:中华书局,2015.
[9]刘笑敢.老子古今:五种対勘与析评引论(附《老子》五种原文对照逐字通检)修订版[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006.
[10]邹晓丽.基础汉字形义释源:《说文》部首今读本义(修订本)[M].北京:中华书局,2007.
[11](美)本杰明·史华兹,程钢译.古代中国的思想世界[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2008.
[12](美)艾兰,张海晏译.水之道与德之端——中国早期哲学思想的本喻(增订本)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010.
[13]任继愈.老子绎读[M].北京:国家图书馆出版社,2015.
[14]王凯.道家诗性精神——兼与海德格尔比较[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
[15]杨国荣.中国哲学二十讲[M].北京:中华书局,2015.
[16]王中江.道家学说的观念史研究[M].北京:中华书局,2015.
[17](美)乔治·莱考夫、马克·约翰逊，何文忠译.我们赖以生存的隐喻[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2015.
[18]陈霞.道家哲学引论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2017.
[19]郑开.道家形而上学研究(增订本)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.
[20]徐梵澄.老子臆解[M].武汉:崇文书局,2018.
[21]高秀昌.道之沉思——老子哲学研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2019.
[22]张法.美学重要问题研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2019.
[23]杨占卿.老子述义[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2019.
[24]张法.中国美学史(3版修订本)[M].成都:四川人民出版社,2020.
[25]杨国荣.老子讲演录[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2021.
[26]叶朗主编,孙焘著.中国美学通史.先秦卷[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2021.
[27]康中乾.《老子》认识论之我见[J].哲学研究,1988(9).
[28]萧兵.“谷神”与“水”的母题——《老子》与《楚辞》的比较神话学研究之一[J].淮阴师专学报（哲学社会科学版）,1988(4).
[29]王博.《管子·水地》篇思想探源[J]管子学刊,1991(3).
[30]王博.《老子“自然”观念的初步研究》[J].中国哲学史: 1995年第3-4期合刊.
[31]潘绍龙、黄承贵.水——老子理想人格的哲学底蕴[J].东南大学学报（社会科学版），1999(2).
[32]黄承贵.水:老子“道”论的本喻[J].青海社会科学,2004,(6).
[33]王庆杰.老子的自然观念——自我的自己而然与他者的自己而然[J].求是学刊，2004(6).
[34]黄承贵、何应敏.水:老子生命哲学的自然底蕴[J].江西社会科学,2005(5).
[35]晏杰雄、刘又华.水的原型意义分析[J].南华大学学报（社会科学版）,2005(2).
[36]陈鼓应.论道与物的关系（下）——中国哲学史上的一条主线[J].哲学动态,2005(8).
[37]陈霞.“道物无际”——道教生态哲学纲要[J].宗教学研究.2006(1).
[38]陆建华.道之两种状态与物之两种形态——兼及道物关系[J].安徽大学学报,2006(6).
[39]孙振玉.老子《道德经》上善之水的五大哲学内涵[J].中国道教,2006(6).
[40]陈思.“大母神”原型对老子创作的影响[J].世界文学评论,2007(2).
[41]谢扬举.老子“自然”概念的实质和理论[J].湖南大学学报（社会科学版）,2009(1).
[42]王中江.道与事物的自然:老子“道法自然”实义考[J].哲学研究,2010(8).
[43]周晓东.先秦道家名思想研究[D].济南:山东大学,2012.
[44]韩玺吾.水性思维：楚文化之主体特征[J].长江大学学报（社科版）,2013(3).
[45]李若晖.中国哲学之真实建立——以《老子》第25章“周行而不殆”为核心论老子道物[J].清华大学学报(哲学与社会科学版),2013(5).
[46]胡红伟.“名”的追寻——名实关系视域下的先秦政治哲学[D].北京:首都师范大学,2013.
[47]蒋伟,胡良桂.“道法自然”的水原型研究[J].求索,2014(1).
[48]萧无陂.道“不可道吗”？——从“名”“实”之辨重新考察《老子》第一章[J].中国文化研究,2014(4).
[49]李辉.《老子》中的隐喻思维——以“水”、“谷”为例[J].集美大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2015(1).
[50]曹峰.先秦道家的“无名”与“有名”[J]思想与文化,2015(2).
[51]林光华.道在物中:再论《老子》的道物关系[J].杭州师范大学学报,2015(3).
[52]罗安宪.论老子哲学中的“自然”[J].学术月刊,2016(10).
[53]岳涛.论《太一生水》的“生命生成论模式”特征[J].中州学刊,2016(12).
[54]徐璐.论《老子》以“水”喻“道”的修辞性思维[J].武汉理工大学（社会科学版）,2017(4).
[55]陈望衡.中国古代美学思想中的美[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017(6).
[56]张勇.《老子》阴阳五行思想研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2017.
[57]李水.《老子》第八章“水”的隐喻机制研究[J].临沂大学学报,2018(4).
[58]陈怀松.《老子》“水喻”哲思中的四重意蕴[J].华夏文化,2018(2).
[59]宋德刚.辨析《老子》之“物”[J].中州学刊,2018(12).
[60]詹石窗、胡瀚霆,《道德经》“玄同”思想新探[J].中州学刊,2018(1).
[61]王博.“然”与“自然”：道家“自然”观念的再研究[J].哲学研究,2018(10).
[62]叶树勋.老子“自然”观念的三个问题[J].人文杂志,2018(5).
[63]罗安宪.论“自然”的两层排斥性意涵[J].哲学研究,2019(2).
[64]杨杰.“道恒无为”还是“道法自然”？——论先秦汉晋道家哲学主旨的转变[J].哲学研究,2019(7).
[65]尹志华.“道法自然”的理论困境与诠释取向[J].哲学动态,2019(12).
[66]曹峰.从“因循万物之性”到“道性自然”——“自然”成为哲学范畴的演变历程[J].人文杂志,2019(8).
[67]郑开.道家的自然观念——从自然与无的关系角度分析[J].哲学动态,2019(2).
[68]韦春和,王洪强.《老子》尚水的楚文化解读[J].南昌工程学院学报.2019(5).
[69]尚永亮、朱春洁.《老子》“玄”与“玄德”新释[J].复旦学报（社会科学版）,2020(1).
[70]温海明.观水悟意——《道德经》之水与意哲学[J].广西职业技术学院学报,2020(3).
[71]丁亮.《老子》文本中“名”的观念[J].中州学刊，2020(2).
[72]罗祥相.论老子“自然”思想的逻辑展开[J].哲学研究,2020(2).
[73]唐善林.老子“自然论”美育思想探析[J].美学研究,2020(3).
[74]叶树勋.老子“物”论探究——结合简帛《老子》的相关信息[J].中国哲学史,2021(1).