- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 X县基层微腐败治理研究    

姓名:

 罗圣荧    

学号:

 19063222576    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 125200    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 公共管理* - 公共管理    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 公共管理硕士    

学校:

 西安电子科技大学    

院系:

 经济与管理学院    

专业:

 公共管理    

研究方向:

 公共管理    

第一导师姓名:

 李刚    

第一导师单位:

 西安电子科技大学    

第二导师姓名:

 罗守煌    

完成日期:

 2023-06-16    

答辩日期:

 2023-05-13    

外文题名:

 Research on Micro-corruption governance at the Grass-roots Level in X County    

中文关键词:

 微腐败 ; 基层干部 ; 监督体系    

外文关键词:

 Micro corruption ; Grassroots cadres ; Supervision system    

中文摘要:

微腐败即未构成犯罪、仅受到党政纪处分或者其它组织处理的腐败案件和行为。统计显示,县级及以下党政机关、基层组织处理的腐败案件95%以上均属于微腐败。县级及其以下的基层党政机构及其基层组织的微腐败,是微腐败治理的重点领域。进一步探讨县级及以下的微腐败治理,具有重要的意义。

以X县为例,2017—2020年之间,X县因微腐败问题被处分的基层干部中,违反政治纪律占2%,经济贪腐占54%,作风懈怠占21%,生活腐化占23%,呈现出以经济问题为主,工作作风和生活作风为辅的微腐败问题结构。X县纪委监委通过抓作风、开展专项整治,仅2021年,查处违反中央八项规定精神案件与群众身边的腐败和作风问题共计196起269人;收集问题线索40条,组织处理10人,给予党纪政务处分22人,移送司法机关2人;开展专项治理,起底、收集问题线索6条,立案查处18人,组织处理3人,追回财政资金二十余万元,对涉嫌违法犯罪的8名相关人员移交县公安机关处理等。但是,微腐败问题依然突出,微腐败治理形势还很严峻,对微腐败现象的认识不足,重视不够;收不良风气影响,社会反响不够一致;监督执行存在不到位现象,村级监督制度缺失;“事前”监督不到位,“事后”惩戒不及时等。这些现象的存在,主要是干部日常教育和管理不足;制度建设尚不完备;绩效考核有缺失,激励机制不健全;专职监督机构作用监督作用发挥仍然不足;审计与财政监督有时难以延伸等造成的。

从X县具体情况来看,要进一步做好微腐败治理,一是要重视微腐败治理的源头,加强思想认识,加强干部教育及日常管理;二是要加强微腐败治理的制度堤防,进一步完善和及时检视修复制度不足;三是重视微腐败治理的物质和心理疏导,重视公务人员合理的物质利益和精神利益需要的实现途径,通畅实现渠道;四是切实加大对微腐败问题的惩戒力度,增加震慑。

通过问卷调查法、访谈法、文献法、案例分析法等研究表明“微腐败”问题虽小,但影响及其恶劣,不利于良好政治生态的形成。千里之堤毁于蚁穴,重视微腐败问题,及时、从严惩戒微腐败,能有效减少“中小腐败”、“大贪腐”的产生,同时做好思想建设、制度建设,一体推进“不敢腐、不能腐、不想腐”体制机制建设,为我国跳出历史周期律贡献纪检力量。

外文摘要:

Micro-corruption refers to corruption cases and acts that do not constitute a crime and are only subject to party and government disciplinary sanctions or handled by other organizations. Statistics show that more than 95 percent of the corruption cases handled by party and government organs and grassroots organizations at the county level and below are micro-corruption. Micro-corruption in grass-roots party and government organs and their grass-roots organizations at the county level and below is a key area for micro-corruption governance. It is of great significance to further explore the governance of micro-corruption at the county level and below.

 

Taking County X as an example, between 2017 and 2020, among the grassroots cadres in County X who were punished for micro-corruption, 2% violated political discipline, 54% were economically corrupt, 21% were lax in work style, and 23% were corrupted in life, showing a micro-corruption problem structure based on economic problems and supplemented by work style and life style. The X County Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has investigated and dealt with a total of 196 cases of corruption and work style problems around the masses in 2021 alone, through grasping work style and carrying out special rectification; 40 clues were collected, 10 people were organized and handled, 22 people were given party discipline and government sanctions, and 2 people were transferred to judicial organs; Carry out special governance, investigate and collect 6 clues about problems, file and investigate 18 people, organize and deal with 3 people, recover more than 200,000 yuan of financial funds, and transfer 8 relevant personnel suspected of violations and crimes to the county public security organs for handling. However, the problem of micro-corruption is still prominent, the situation of micro-corruption governance is still very serious, and the understanding and attention to the phenomenon of micro-corruption is insufficient. Negative culture influence, social response is not consistent enough; Supervision and implementation are not in place, and the village-level supervision system is lacking; "Beforehand" supervision is not in place, and "after" punishment is not timely. The existence of these phenomena is mainly due to the lack of daily education and management of cadres; Institutional construction is not yet complete; There are deficiencies in performance appraisal and imperfect incentive mechanisms; The role of full-time supervisory bodies and the role of supervision are still inadequate; Audit and financial oversight are sometimes difficult to extend.

 

From the perspective of the specific situation of County X, to further do a good job in micro-corruption governance, first, we must pay attention to the source of micro-corruption governance, strengthen ideological understanding, and strengthen cadre education and daily management; Second, it is necessary to strengthen the institutional embankment of micro-corruption governance, and further improve and timely review and repair the shortcomings of the system; The third is to attach importance to the material and psychological counseling of micro-corruption governance, attach importance to the ways to realize the reasonable material and spiritual interests of public servants, and smooth the channels for realization; Fourth, effectively increase the intensity of punishment for micro-corruption and increase deterrence.

 

Through questionnaire survey method, interview method, literature method, case analysis method and other research methods, the results show that although the problem of "micro-corruption" is small, its impact is very bad, which is not conducive to the formation of a good political ecology. Paying attention to the problem of micro-corruption and promptly and severely punishing micro-corruption can effectively reduce the occurrence of "small and medium-sized corruption" and "large corruption", and at the same time do a good job in ideological construction and system construction, and promote the construction of "do not dare to be corrupt, cannot be corrupted, and do not want to be corrupt" as a whole, and contribute discipline inspection forces to our country jumping out of the law of historical cycles.

参考文献:
[1] 习近平.中国共产党第十八届中央纪律检查委员会第六次全体会议公报[J].人民日报,2016-01-14.
[2] 塞缪尔·亨廷顿.变动社会的政治秩序[M].张岱云等译.上海:上海译文出版社,1989
[3] 布坎南.关于寻租社会的理论[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1992
[4] 张宇燕,富景筠.当代美国的腐败——数据、案例与机理[J].国际经济评论,2006(06)
[5] 埃尔顿·梅奥.工业文明的社会问题[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2013
[6] 杰拉尔德·E·凯登,O·P·德威维迪,约瑟夫·捷波朗. 王云燕译. [N]人民日报出版社,2017
[7] 杰瑞米•波普.制约腐败:建构国家廉政体系[M].北京:中国方正出版社,2003
[8] 辛向阳.当前我国腐败现象的新特点与反腐败的对策[J].理论参考,2011(07)
[9] 史云贵.哪些基层腐败令人深恶痛绝[OL].人民论坛网.2017-5-22.
[10] 陈建平,胡卫卫,郑逸芳.农村基层小微权力腐败的发生机理及治理路径研究[J].河南社会科学,2016(05)
[11] 刘诗林,李辉.双重领导与多任务性:中国乡镇纪检监察组织监督困境的实证研究[J].公共行政评,2014,7(03):107-132+178-179.
[12] 蔡娟.制度科学化与当代中国惩治和预防腐败体系的构建[J]. 江汉论坛,2012(005)
[13] 定明杰,史健通.城乡结合部的“村官”腐败问题及其治理[J].中州学刊,2015(16)
[14] 马南萍.运用法治思维正风反腐[J].中国纪检监察网,2021-1-21-理论周刊
[15] 徐家良.隐性腐败的表现形式及根治措施[J].人民论坛,2016(21)
[16] 孟德斯鸠.论法的精神[M].许明龙译.北京:商务印书馆,2012
[17] 约翰·爱默里克·爱德华·达尔伯格-阿克顿.自由与权力[M].南京:译林出版社,1887
[18] 陈一新.加强和创新社会治理(深入学习贯彻党的十九届五中全会精神)[J].人民日报,2021-01-22-第 09 版
[19] 王岐山.把监督执纪的权力关进制度笼子[J].人民日报,2016-12-06
[20] 邓小平.党和国家领导制度的改革[J].人民日报,1980-8-18
[21] 习近平.习近平在十八届中央纪委六次全会上发表重要讲话[J].人民日报,2016-05-03.
[22] 贝卡利亚.论犯罪与刑法罚[M].钟书峰译.北京:法律出版社,2021
[23] 于风政.腐败文化及其形成与治理[J赵乐际.2021-1-23.赵乐际在十九届中央纪委五次全会上作工作报告].中国特色社会主义研究,2002(03)
[24] 俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000
[25] 切塞雷·贝卡利亚.犯罪与刑罚论[M].黄风译.北京:中国方正出版社,2014
[26] 王岐山.全面从严治党承载起党在新时代的使命[J].人民日报,2016 - 11 - 8 -第 7 版
[27] 本书编写组.党的十九届四中全会〈决定〉学习辅导百问[M].北京:学习出版社,2019
[28] 赵波,张慧琴,张翔宇.村干部素质特征与农村经济发展的关系研究[J].农村经济,2013(11)
[29] 吴传户,叶晓伟.从反腐败谈纪检监察体制的缺陷与改革措施[J].丽水师范专科学校学报,2001(04):17-20.
[30] 王敏.“一审一查一清单”提升乡镇办案质效[J].廉政瞭望(上半月),2019(02):113.
[31] 徐喜林.进一步健全党的纪检监察体制的思路对策[J].中州学刊,2014(04):12-16.
[32] 过勇,宋伟.中国县级纪检监察机构的现状、困境与改革思路[J].经济社会体制比较,2015(04):142-153
[33] 陈韧.发挥纪检监察部门监督职能的思考[J].企业改革与管理,2016 (20): 191.
[34] 胡序杭.创新农村基层纪检领导体制和工作机制[J].中共杭州市委党校学报,2016(06):10-15.
[35] 李朋方.新时期加强基层纪检监察干部队伍建设研究[J].政治与社会,2015(10)
[36] 王翠芳.西方权力制约监督的机制与启发借鉴[J].理论参考,2014(06):53-55.
[37] 吴华.运用辩证思维规范乡镇纪检监察工作[J]. 中国纪检监察报,2018-07-26(008).
[38] 徐惠红.基层纪检监察机构如何提升履职能力[J].人民论坛,2015(23):32-34.
[39] 周小玲.落实“三转”,让纪检监察机关回归本位[J].当代兵团,2014(12):42.
[40] 亚里士多德.政治学[M].何兆武译.北京:商务印书馆,1980
[41] 习近平.习近平总书记在全国脱贫攻坚总结表彰大会上的讲话[J].新华网,2021-02-25
中图分类号:

 D63    

馆藏号:

 57730    

开放日期:

 2023-12-25    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式