身体素养从身体、认知、环境等多维度视角被理解为是维持身体活动或运动的一种综合能力。国内外研究者从不同研究主题角度，在不同时间，针对不同主体对身体素养领域进行了大量研究，然而这些文献资料数据往往是零散且不具有结构性。如何迅速而准确的在大量无序研究数据中把握国内外研究热点与前沿趋势是身体素养领域发展中的重要环节。利用可视化知识图谱的方式对身体素养领域文献进行数据量化、数据形象化，建立一个结构化的知识体系，把握身体素养领域前沿与热点，这将对我国身体素养领域的发展具有一定的借鉴意义。

本文通过信息可视化工具对身体素养领域的研究进行可视化分析，利用直观的图谱对该领域内的研究主体、知识主题、研究热点以及前沿演化进行了分析研究，并探寻我国身体素养研究的问题及出路。通过分析得出的主要结论有：

国外身体素养研究的核心作者是马克•特雷姆布莱（MARK S TREMBLAY），他作为此领域发文量最多的作者，且与其他作者的合作交流密切，可称作是该领域的领军人物，应重点追踪关注；澳大利亚高校参与身体素养相关领域研究最多，且科研成果丰富；美国政府机构给予的科研经费最多，利于美国研究机构更好地进行身体素养相关研究。美国、澳大利亚、加拿大和英国所产出地科研成果领先世界前列，身体素养领域学术共同体初步形成。

Edwards LC在2017年发表在《运动医学》的身体素养的定义、基础和联系：一个系统性评价（Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review）这篇文章应重点关注。九个聚类类团大致总结了身体素养的内涵，涉足了身体素养与医学、生活、环境与教学等方面。该领域与医学的跨学科研究较为热门，这为后续的研究指明了方向。

身体活动、健康素养、干预、效果和行为是该领域国外的热点关键词。在2010-2020身体素养发展一共经历了三个时期——蓬勃发展时期、缓慢发展时期和低谷时期。

我国身体素养领域研究政策导向鲜明，从“身体素养”一词出现到现在历经了起步期、空窗期和活跃期三个时期。我国在该领域的研究主要呈现“重认知，轻实践”、“重群体，轻个体”、“重国外，轻本土”三个问题，为此，为其提出的解决对策分别是“发展合作伙伴关系”、“制定个人进阶计划”、“融入本土文化精神”。

Physical literacy is understood as a comprehensive ability to maintain physical activity or movement from a multi-dimensional perspective such as body, cognition, and environment. Researchers at home and abroad have conducted a lot of research on the field of physical literacy from the perspective of different research topics and at different times for different subjects. However, these literature data are often scattered and unstructured. How to quickly and accurately grasp research hotspots and cutting-edge trends at home and abroad from a large amount of disorderly research data is an important link in the development of physical literacy. Using the visual knowledge map to quantify and visualize the literature in the field of physical literacy, establish a structured knowledge system, and grasp the frontiers and hotspots of the field of physical literacy, which will have certain reference significance for the development of the field of physical literacy in my country.

This paper uses information visualization tools to visually analyze the research in the field of physical literacy, and uses intuitive atlas to analyze and study the research subjects, knowledge topics, research hotspots and frontier evolution in the field, and explore the problems and solutions of physical literacy research in my country . The main conclusions drawn through the analysis are:

The core author of foreign physical literacy research is MARK S TREMBLAY. As the author with the most articles in this field, he has close cooperation and exchanges with other authors and can be called a leader in this field. It should be focused on tracking; Australian universities participate in the most research on physical literacy related fields and have rich scientific research results; US government agencies have given the most scientific research funding, which is conducive to better physical literacy-related research by US research institutions. The scientific research results produced by the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom lead the world, and an academic community in the field of physical literacy has initially formed.

Edwards LC published in "Sports Medicine" in 2017: Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review. This article should be focused on. The nine clusters roughly summarized the connotation of physical literacy and involved physical literacy and medicine, life, environment and teaching. Interdisciplinary research in this field and medicine is more popular, which points out the direction for follow-up research.

Physical activity, health literacy, intervention, effect and behavior are hot keywords in this field abroad. In 2010-2020, the development of physical literacy has experienced three periods-a period of vigorous development, a period of slow development, and a period of trough.

The research policy direction in the field of physical literacy in my country is clear. From the appearance of the term "physical literacy" to the present, it has experienced three periods: the initial period, the empty window period and the active period. Our country’s research in this field mainly presents three problems: “emphasis on cognition, neglect of practice”, “emphasis on groups, neglect of individuals”, and “emphasis on foreign countries and neglect of locality”. "Develop partnerships", "make personal advancement plans", and "integrate into the spirit of local culture".